DePartedPrinter wrote:I hope you realize that Redrock Micro holds patents on almost all of their stuff. I would tread lightly ripping their tech off and re-selling it (its a great way to get sued). However, printing copies for yourself at home should be ok...which brings me back to my first question...
Any chance you would post the stl?
This is a gear, and this use of a gear is not the only one of it's kind. But sorry, not posting an STL on this.
I am all for helping the community with things specific to the printer as I have done.
jefferysanders wrote:I would not personally gloat about patent infringement either (if that's the case).
Seriously? That's what you think? Wow. That's what I get for showing off a tool's usefulness beyond a being just a new thing.
jefferysanders wrote:I kinda doubt that this specific item has a valid patent on it, nevertheless I would take caution and I would expect that if your statement's here if ever recovered could be used in court against you.
A exact copy is one thing....taking other's ideas and reworking it into something equal or better is clever, productive and ultimately innovative vs. lazy, abusive, and thoughtless...I could harp all day on intellectual property thieves, but it is fairly easy for me to generate new random and innovate things...so I could just be speaking based upon these egocentrically derived thoughts.
I make one test print and you make accusations all over me. Thanks for assuming that I won't rework or innovate, calling me a thief, and all your other assumptions. Yeah I'm done here. Nice work pal. You boys enjoy your little printer party.
Admin you can delete my account. Thanks.