1

Topic: Makerbot software

Hi Guys...

I have a friend who just got a makerbot, and I was stunned at the way the software interacts with the printer. Given that I need to use there different applications to get a print I designed to a place where the SD will print it, I was wondering if it was possible to use makerbot software, or some other integrated software...

RepeterHost really does not work well for me...

Something to discuss...

-Skyer

2

Re: Makerbot software

Makerware won't even let you manually control the printer. That means filament changes, pre-heating bed, etc all must be done through the printer's control panel.

3

Re: Makerbot software

I have not had a chance to play with the software.
Thanks for the heads up Lawsy... I didn't know that Makerware won't allow you to control the printer.

I guess i need to looks elsewhere...

-Skyler

4

Re: Makerbot software

Cura might work well for what you want.  It can slice models and is very fast.  I don't know if it has manual control buttons, but neither does makerware.  It is primarily used with Ultimaker printers, however it works just as well with the Solidoodle or any other reprap type printer.  It is also, in my opinion, the best looking open source host software.

5

Re: Makerbot software

I have been using Cura to generate GCode, and I really like how it does it.
I have not tried to print from Cura, but would like to find something that is "all in one"

A friend of mine just bought a Makerbot, and went from setup to printing with no prior experience in three days. I am still struggling. sad

-Skyler

6

Re: Makerbot software

If you have a solidoodle, its because he kinda paid 5x the cost of a solidoodle for that ease of use.  The Solidoodle is a machine for DIYers and is priced as such.  All of this is my opinion, by the way.

7

Re: Makerbot software

Yes ITman, I definitely understand that point.

Given that the software is out there for a streamlined application, I thought I would ask...
I prefer my SD3.. great machine, the software end is now the bottleneck for me...

-Skyler

8

Re: Makerbot software

Yeah, Repetier did give me a lot of problems at first, but eventually it did become usable.  Especially the new versions with the new Slic3r version.

9

Re: Makerbot software

I guess I need to upgrade to the latest Repetier then.
I was worried it would not work with my Soliddoodle... Had some issues getting the printer to talk the first time I loaded everything up...

-Skyler

10 (edited by Fel 2014-02-16 00:49:17)

Re: Makerbot software

I'm using Cura just about every way imaginable to control my stock Solidoodle 4.  I downloaded 14.01 at first to generate gcode because it is a STUPID-FAST slicer.  Every time you make an adjustment to the part or a setting, it automatically begins slicing again in the background and is done just a couple of seconds later.  On a whim I asked it to print and the control interface opened up showing everything I needed to manually control the machine, edit gcode, etc. I hit print and was serendipitously printing 5 minutes after plugging into the printer.  I later pasted some gcode into RH for Solidoodle 0.85 just to complete the experiment I had intended to, and that workflow worked as well, but seriously, why bother.  A lot of the recent changes to MakerWare were sparked by Cura-envy, and it still has a long way to go before it achieves what the Ultimaker developers have done with their software. 

Some of the features that really makes Cura stand out for me is that it does multiple parts like a dream and you can sink parts into the bed and then duplicate/flip to split parts that are too big to print in one piece.  You don't want to try printing without configuring first because it is written for Ultimakers, which have lighter print heads thanks to the bowden design, and can go much faster because of this.  It also supports multiple extruders and you can use 1 extruder for support and others for part materials.  The visual interface is also much smoother than what you get from MakerWare, especially when viewing sliced parts and toolpath visualizations.  No matter how big the cajones are in your rig, MakerWare can't take full advantage like Cura can.  To me, both of these packages are head-and-shoulders above all other interfaces for desktop opensource 3D printers, and Cura is even worthy of a league above MakerWare.

My only issue, and this is still a big one that I may be able to solve if I look into it, is that I have to power-cycle my printer and reboot my laptop between prints.  Obviously this isn't insurmountable, just mildly inconvenient, but since I was having the same issue printing through RH, I'm really not complaining at all.

11

Re: Makerbot software

Thanks for the post Fel.
I would love to get Cura to print direct to my SD3. At this time I have been generating GCode and printing it in RH.
I'm thinking about creating a new thread and documenting how to set up Cura for SD smile are you in Fel?

Thanks again...

- Skyler

12

Re: Makerbot software

I downloaded Cura yesterday, with the intent of installing and playing around with it on my SD4.  I'd be interested in a dedicated thread.

13

Re: Makerbot software

I was just looking at the Cura download page and see there is a NetFabb installer. I have NetFabb and run all my .stl files through it prior to printing to fix any issues before Slicer tells me about them, adding yet another step to the workflow between design and print stages.

Anyone using it or know what the level of integration is between the two?

I'm going to download Cura and set it up on my desktop computer to play around with, once I know my way around in it I'll try some basic stuff and then see if I can figure out the NetFabb piece.