Re: Dual "Y" drive motors
I will add to that: Since HBOT has a single belt, belt tensioning has less of an impact on the system (perfect circles). The bad thing is the X axis flexing out of square. As the distance between ends increases, the linear rods have less chance of being able to keep the axis square to the Y axis with fast movements. A good compensation for this is using linear rails instead of rods.
A COREXY has the benefit of using the tension of the two separate belts to counter-act the problem with keeping the X axis square, but requires both belts to be perfectly tensioned to each other.
I prefer HBOT on the merit that it is easier to setup. You can use proper design to keep your axis square, and the single belt makes taking things apart repeatedly much easier. You dont have to tighten the belt at the ends either, if you put oblong mounting holes for the motors so you use the motor to tighten the belts (like the Y motor on the SD).
Here is a good illustration of an HBOT:
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:161000
Great info. Makes sense as to why h bot is a bit more popular at the moment. One other small thing, coreXY can be tensioned in the same way (with the motor mounts being elongated that is.