Makes sense. Many people make the blanket statement that "ABS is better", but it's more complicated than that as per usual. Everything I've seen with a vague semblance of science to it suggests PLA wins on stiffness and hardness (wear resistance), so for gear teeth / meshing interface is a better option. It is however not as tough, and the ultimate tensile strength usually ends up lower than ABS (basically it cracks before it deforms; it's more brittle).
Has anyone considered making a gear where the hub & web are ABS but the rim and teeth are PLA (or for the advanced material scientists amongst us nylon)? That could be a pretty creative option, using the best properties of each material where they're needed the most. Be careful of the different thermal coefficients and PLA's cold blood - it would have to be a room temp application.
ABS wins on retaining it's mechanical properties above about 40°C though, which I consider to be a big deal. YMMV.
SD3. Mk2b + glass, heated enclosure, GT2 belts, direct drive y shaft, linear bearings, bowden-feed E3D v5 w/ 0.9° stepper
Smoothieboard via Octoprint on RPi