1

Topic: Choices :s

Really scratching my head on what 3D printer I should get. I had made a choice (simply out of laziness) on choose the CubeX, however I have come to find alot of bad reviews on its reliability and even getting the thing to print right.

So I though I should ask some opinions on suggested options. Features I would like would be printing in multi colors. ABS / SLA materials. Decent accuracy (aerospace grade not required), and a good size bed. Budget - About £4000 USD (£2500 GBP)

Any pointers in the "good" models would be great, or even DIY kits

Thanks

Rusty

2

Re: Choices :s

Take a close look at the new Ultimaker 2.  It's single extruder, but high quality and fast.  Bukobot has a good dual extruder, but it is an open design, so better for PLA than ABS.  Also look at Flashforge Creator.  They are Makerbot clones with dual extruders, but in copying they also address problems that users had to overcome by modding their printers.  For size, some of the biggest printers are from thefutureis3d.com, which has a good reputation for service.

Something to consider it whether a printer uses an all metal hot end, or can have its hot end replaced with one.  That will give you more options for high temp materials like polycarbonate.

3

Re: Choices :s

Ian,

Huge thanks for you reply, and insight.

I will take a look at the models you mention.

Also, massive thanks your the comment about the metal hot end (albeit Im not exactly sure what you mean) but opening up to more material option would be greatly beneficial (If only I could afford a metal printer!!)

4

Re: Choices :s

Most hot ends have a plastic portion leading up to the heated nozzle which can be ruined by getting them over 245C.  Some materials like Polycarbonate need to be printed at 250C, and also higher temperatures make it easier to print faster.  The faster the head moves, the faster the extruder has to push out the plastic, and the plastic flows more easily at higher temperatures.  With a hot end that is made completely of metal, you can go up to 300C without damaging it.  The open source, kit printers are more easily modded and tinkered with, so that is something to consider.

5

Re: Choices :s

Now I understand. Thanks you

Thats the 3D Systems option completely out the window, there seems so much more out there for your money. Im glad I asked now.

Do all the ones you mention above have a good print success rate?
Can you use filaments from any source with them?


Also, as a completely separate discussion, are there any good ceramic 3D printers out there?

6

Re: Choices :s

3D Systems charges $50 for .5kg of filament in chipped cartridges.  All other low cost printers can use 3rd party filament which is $30 for 1kg.  That printer is for people who think they can push a button and print an object without needing to learn anything about 3D printing, which isn't true of any printer under $10k.

Hyrel 3D has been experimenting with ceramic printing, but I don't know if you can buy one yet - http://www.hyrel3d.com/

7

Re: Choices :s

Im really torn between the Indimension3 Glacier Peak, the FlashForge Creator and the Ultimaker 2.

The Flashforge is cheap as chips, and Im wondering the extra build size on the Glacier Peak is really worth the big step in price.

Other than the build size capability, are these 3 printers all in a similar ball park.

Can they all print poly carbonate

8

Re: Choices :s

The Flashforge is getting good reports. Since it's a (legal) clone of a Makerbot Replicator it benefits from the Replicator's popularity. So you can use the Sailfish firmware (a very nice enhanced "fork" of the open source Makerbot firmware), take advantage of enhancements produced by the community (e.g. machined metal extruders, replacement build plates, etc.). The only real "downside" to the Flashforge is that you're supporting a company that's basically copying someone else's work and cranking copies out cheap. It's entirely legal, of course, because everything in the Replicator is open and published, but they're not paying developers to work on improving the software, etc., which is something I like to support even if it costs a bit more. But in terms of what you physically get, it's a good printer, with two print heads, heated print bed, the ability to print ABS, PLA and all sorts of other materials, and (kinda) membership in the largest user community of any home 3D printer.

Both Ultimaker and Flashforge are made of wood, which is technically fine, but it would look out of place in an office, if that's an issue.

One thing I'd say is that huge print sizes on home 3D printers isn't generally useful. That is, to print a huge object you'd have to leave it running for days at a time, and there are good odds that you'd have some issue somewhere in the print so you're usually better off printing in more, smaller pieces and assembling them. Compare having to get a week-long print to go perfectly and restarting and running another week whenever there's any problem, vs. printing fourteen 12-hour prints, and any problem just meant reprinting that one component. One exception to this would be an extremely high speed printer, the QU-BD RXL which is just starting to ship, so there's a fairly long waiting list right now. They've shown videos (http://store.qu-bd.com/product.php?id_product=44) of 500 mm/s printing, and the results look quite good, and at that speed you could cover a huge area in a more reasonable time.

Note: I have a Replicator that I've been using for years, and have ordered a QU-BD RPM, which is a combination extruder and CNC mill, which I hope will ship in the next few weeks.

9

Re: Choices :s

Thanks Laird,

I see where your coming from with a full all in one large print being prone to possible errors. Can a glued model but just as good as a full print then?

In regards to the replicator being open source, could I actually build this myself and gain much needed knowledge, enjoyment and the chance to improve areas. I have access to CNC milling machines, etc. Do you need much programming knowledge

10

Re: Choices :s

If you want to build yourself, it is much better to get a kit to begin with.  You will learn plenty from putting it together and working with all the components.  Building another from scratch would work better after you have some hands-on understanding of the parts and what is required of them.

11

Re: Choices :s

Been having a good think, and Im going to go with a pre-built model to start with, so to avoid any frustrations during a first build that may put me off. I can then at least get used to the process and the way it all works, then approach a self build.

So, with the point about large models could lead to problems, I guess I can tick the indimension3 off the list.

This leaves,
Ultimaker 2
FlashForge Creator
Makerbot Replicator 2X


Ultimaker
230 x 225 x 205 mm Build Size
Single Print Head
Max Temp - No Info??
Hot End - Doesn't say if its all metal?
Cost - $2750

FlashForge Creator
225X145X150mm Build Size
Dual Head
Max Temp - 260 C
Hot End - Doesn't say if its all metal?
Cost - $1200

Makerbot Replicator 2X
246 x 152 x 155 mm Build Size
Dual Head
Max Temp - No Info?
Hot End - Dosen't look to be all metal?
$3350

Does the ultimaker perform well??

12

Re: Choices :s

oh and of course the REVOLUTION XL 3D PRINTER as mentioned above, that prints amazingly fast.
Bit of a smaller build size, but it seems to have a hot head suitable for 350 C and can print alot of materials

13

Re: Choices :s

If I were to drop $3000, it would have to be on a Form 1 SL printer.

Chuck Bittner is a quadriplegic gamer who is petitioning the major console developers to include internal button remapping in all console games. You can help.
Sign Chuck Bittners petition

14

Re: Choices :s

Ultimaker prints quite well. I like that company a lot, but I can't afford.

15

Re: Choices :s

Got to be honest, having spoke to them via email, Im really really keen on the R.P.M. RAPID PROTOTYPING MILL
To have the ability to 3D print with ABS, PLA, polycarbonate, PEEK, and Nylon (Nozzle spec'ed at 350C Temps), As well as converting the printer into a full water cooled milling machine, which im told is fully capable of aluminium machining, is amazing.

Does any one have any experience or comments on this machine?

16

Re: Choices :s

Nope. They haven't shipped a single one yet, and no one has ever see it mill anything.

17

Re: Choices :s

hmmmmm, ok, thats a bit of a worry

18

Re: Choices :s

Hi Everyone,

Well, I went down the R.P.M route...............and failed. QU-BD are a very poor company, not a single R.P.M have been delivered yet, and they are getting huge amounts of bad press.

So, Im back on square 1.
Im not thinking of going the flash forge route, however, I thought I would check on a few things

1) Is the flashforge pretty high resolution?

2) Can I upgrade the head to allow me high temperatures (therefore Polycarbonate printing), and if so, what is recommended

3) are there any known issues with the flash forge