Heartlander wrote:SD, it is disheartening to hear you respond that I have recourse with the other vendors and telling me to take up my issues with them, while not mentioning the issues I have with Solidoodle quality. See, most folks would have taken that bull by the horns. You ducked.
I just wasn't sure what you meant about plugins. To be honest, I didn't see the post about the sparks.
Heartlander wrote:Why am I fighting with hardware problems? Why did my jigsaw shatter? Why does my extruder heater work intermittently? Why, after running autotune on it (and why do I have to do that?) does it still turn itself off (AND on!) and why do I have to watch the temperature like a hawk in case it decides to doze off in the middle of a part? Why did the wire break off? Why does it do it after I re-soldered the wire?
It sucks for anyone to have to do unnecessary trouble shooting. We do provide tech support by phone and e-mail for anyone who asks for it. By the sounds of it, most of the problems stem from an improperly set-up thermistor. A lot of people have difficulty repairing this section of the Solidoodle, as it has multiple points of failure.
I'm not sure why your Jigsaw is broken, but if it was damaged over time, it was due to heat. We make the extruder out of acrylic because of cost concerns, and sometimes this does happen. Most of the time it remains functional. As you can see from this forum, many users simply elect to replace it. We will be keeping this concern in mind for future versions of the printer.
The reason you have to run autotune (and you should only have to run it once), is that not all hot-ends / thermistors are the same. They must each be calibrated after a replacement. Else, the heating cycle will be off. Active electronics in the hot-end could reduce the need for that, but that the current method keeps costs low.
I think the wider question here is "why did I even have to repair my Solidoodle"? The answers depends on whether the damage occurred in shipping, or if it occurred after use. If it occurred during shipping, the answer is most likely "You might not have had to " - we often repair printers damaged in shipping for users. If the printer was damaged in use, that depends on how you used the printer, but it can be said that we are always willing to work with people who have had part failures. If it's our fault, we help. Universally.
That said, if you report your part failure 8-10 months after purchase, that makes things very hard on us. That is stretching very far for a machine that does not have a warranty.
Heartlander wrote:And guys, saying that I only spent $800 on a printer and am not really entitled to expectations of reasonable quality just shows me how assimilated you have become. Damn you Borg!
@#$%^^5!!!! No, it should work, at least for a few months, without falling apart, without have to be fought at every turn. $800 is a lot of money to some folks and to blow it on a crappy product really stings.
While we understand that you're disappointed, please do keep in mind that we are familiar with the frustrations some customers are feeling. We have already improved the design a great deal over the past year, to help avoid problems of this nature. You're right that the Solidoodle can't quite be compared to a microwave, but compared to home built model, it is often more reliable. I think that are you are entitled to a great customer experience. If we screwed up, we can look into it.
We understand that 3D printers aren't quite as user friendly as they could be, and we are working on it.
Heartlander wrote:I know how far you have come, how cool it is in so many ways. I still get excited about the potential and think its really amazing when a part comes out right. But guys, you need to step back from new product development and put a lot of beef behind quality improvement and quality ASSURANCE. You won't make it in the market long if you have guys bitching about your reliability.
We hear you loud and clear. We are always working to make the Solidoodle more reliable.
Heartlander wrote:You asked about mysteries. Here's one. Why does my SketchUp let me make a perfectly good looking part, create an STL that passes muster as a clean water-tight drawing (according to some of the many plug-ins you say you're not aware of) and then Slic3r seems to think its okay to slice, but when its gets handed off to the printer, the printer starts printing in mid-air or prints something that has absolutely no relationship to any part of the drawing I made?
You shouldn't need plugins to make parts in Sketchup. At this stage in the game, you will need to monitor the output of any slicer. Slic3r is the best out there, but it is capable of making mistakes, especially with damaged files. Again, alerting the Slic3r folks of your errors will help eliminate this. Given the fact that Slic3r is 100% free, it is accomplishing a great deal.
Heartlander wrote:Why does NetFabb the "repair" it and give me a part in which all the holes, large and small have been skinned over, where I have ramps where there were none before and the part generally looks like it have been scribbled on by every tagger on the West Side? And then, likely as not, it STILL won't print?
Are you sending high polycount files to netFabb? We have seen this kind of thing when users have sent extremely high quality files through the service. Since there isn't a massive advantage to high poly count files in 3D printing, many 3D printing software packages do not do well with them. At any rate, sending them your errors, and garbled files will help them fix the problem. Also, do your best to avoid binary .STL files, as some programs cannot properly handle them.
Neither of these cases are examples of netFabb, or Slic3r being poorly developed pieces of software. 3D model processing, and tool path are tough computational problems, that do not have perfect results at the moment. What you see in Slic3r, is the the most honest effort to perfect the process I have seen so far. There is no guide to writing slicers at the moment, no O'Reilly book to follow, no stack-exchange.
This is cutting edge stuff, and I am frequently amazed that it works.
Heartlander wrote:I'm not imagining this stuff an I know I'm not the only one experiencing it. Yes, some of it is because I haven't yet learned all thousand and one little tricks the gray beards use to coax a drawing into printing, but it should NOT be that way.
It really isn't that way in most cases. I bring a printer to demonstrations all the time, and simply press print to print. I've never had to repair a printer on site at a demo, and I've never had an issue that prevented me from printing. I'm not saying that problems like this don't happen, obviously they do, but if the printer were so temperamental is to need thousands of tips, I think the support guys would have already pulled out our hair already. Generally, when we receive an "impossible, temperamental printer" we can get in running within 20 minutes.
We can't change the way the software operates in a meaningful way at the moment ( since we are purely a hardware manufacturer, and do not produce software in any form), that hasn't been our motive so far. What I can say is that you've had a bad time with the printer itself, and that sucks. If you get in touch with [email protected], I'm sure they can help work something out with you. We don't have hearts of stone.
Heartlander wrote:What we need is a Steve Jobs to come in and kick the industry's ass from one end to the other, scanning, drawing, printing, hardware and software. Either the current players will up their game or get steam rolled when someone with deep pockets decides this is just too good to pass up, too many targets, too many easy kills, too many folks that think half-ass is good enough, just get it to market before someone else does. Hell, the Chinese do better than this.
The industry is moving quickly. Who knows what lies in store for future models, and future upgrades. Everyone at Solidoodle reads these boards, and realizes the criticisms against the product. However, we realize that criticisms like this are common across the 3D printing market. We do our best to help where we can, and we are pretty proud that we can provide our product at a price where even less affluent users can afford to 3D print.
It looks like you got things up and running. I hope you have fun, and let us know if there is anything else we can do.
Former Solidoodle employee, no longer associated with the company.