fr333n3rgy wrote:It is uneconomical (and a hassle) to ship scraps to a central location for recycling since the shipping will be higher than purchasing virgin pellets
That... isn't true.
I've been looking at this for a long time, and I can't make anything outside of centralized recycling (like Ggalisky's setup) work out. Lets take a look at the numbers.
Lets assume you're able to machine those teeth out of hard steel (or conversely, soft steel and then heat treat them) for $5/ea. Even a small shredder needs 10 teeth per shaft, plus the cleaning spacers (do not need to be hardened). You're looking at ~$150 before you've even made a chassis (6061, I'd assume) and bearings. You might be able to do it with a BoM of $175. Maybe. It is commonly accepted that your retail price must be at least 2.3x BoM, even in maker businesses. Now you're looking at $400/ea - lets assume you do free shipping just to make the numbers easy.
$400 buys a lot of pellets. Lets take a look at the three options:
Virgin Pellets
It buys 120lbs of 4043D PLA (shipped, from OS3DP) or 100lbs of MG94 ABS. That is a lifetime supply for most folks - in fact, I'm only aware of one Filastruder customer that has extruded more than this from their machine.
Centralized recycling
You can fit about 10lbs of failed prints in a large flat rate box, which costs $15 to ship. It can be returned in a medium flat rate box, which costs $10 to ship. It takes about 10 minutes to granulate and reship, so figure on $5 for that - now you're looking at $30 for 10lbs of regrind (recycled prints). Your $400 buys 130lbs of either ABS or PLA worst case, maybe more if you live closer to the recycler and can use by-weight shipping for a lower cost.
Distributed recycling
As noted above, the cheapest a shredder could realistically be sold is about $400. Note that this would be cheaper than the cheapest shredder on the market. However, such a shredder would be hand cranked, so now we need to value time as part of the equation. Let optimistically assume you can shred 1lb in 15 minutes by hand. Based on reports from other shredders on the market, this is likely optimistic. You're then looking at 32 hours of time to shred 130lbs, which at reasonable wages ($15/hr) is already more expensive per pound than centralized recycling - and you haven't even started to pay off the shredder yet.
That raises the next point - in order to pay off the shredder, you're looking at needing over 100lbs of failed prints. Remember how I said 100lbs would likely be a lifetime supply of filament? Very, very few people are going to have enough prints to even break even on a $400 (or $300, if you make the mistake of selling for less than the rule of thumb) shredder. I print on average 6-8 hours a day, every day, and I've amassed about 30lbs of failed prints in total - on over 200lbs of filament.
I'd love for the economics to work for personal shredders - but I can't in good conscience go down that road until either shipping gets much more expensive, or heat treated blades get cheaper. Like real cheap.