Re: replace every belt and pulley with GT2?
jagowilson wrote:I still say fishing line is better than GT2s based on the design of higher end printers I've seen which use a braided line stock. I have some coming (thanks wardjr), can't wait to install it.
I'm not a big proponent of fishing line.
I had a Printrbot Simple which used fishing line for the XY transport and everyone I know of that had one, tried everything they could to minimize slippage.
Over a long print, slippage is all but inevitable with fishing line. We tried sand paper on the pulleys, we tried neoprene tubing, we tried toothed pulleys, we even tried the fishing line directly on the motor shaft, There was always some slippage. The longer the print went, the more it slipped and the print deviated, which made tall prints look like they were leaning.
Long story short, Printrbot gave up on the fishing line and redesigned the PB Simple to use GT2 belts.
Just my $0.02 on the fishing line subject.
I think the culprit of slipping is the line itself. Certain line is difficult to get and keep tight. I have tried many different styles and have settled on Sufix brand as being the best. It doesn't matter how long my prints are I have never experienced any slippage. I really don't see how slippage would cause a print to lean to just one side. If the line truely slipped that would show up in both directions of an axis.
Now I've never owned a PrinterBot so I am certainly not saying you are wrong. I feel that we all find what works best for our needs. For me that's fishing line and for you it's GT2 belts. I figure since we both seem to get better results than most we both must be doing something right
3-SD3's & a Workbench all fully enclosed, RH-Slic3r Win7pro, E3D V6, Volcano & Cyclops Hot End
SSR/500W AC Heated Glass Bed, Linear bearings on SS rods. Direct Drive Y-axis, BulldogXL
Thanks to all for your contributions