Topic: Interesting comments from Sam at CNETs 3D Printer Panel
http://www.solidoodle.com/2013/06/solid … g-support/
(bold added for emphasis)
A major theme was the idea of innovation pushing the industry forward, and how making 3D printing easier and more affordable has taken it so far and will continue to play a major factor in bringing it to even more consumers.
Sloan also inquired about differences between machines and use of filaments. When asked about using industry-standard filaments vs. closed cartridges, Sam pointed to innovation as a reason why an open design is good:
“We recommend our own filaments because we know they’re the best quality and have fewer issues with clogging than others…we like having the open design with filaments because it encourages innovation with printing materials.”
So open design elements when it comes to the filament, is a good thing - in fact its apparently important to drive innovation and push the industry forward.... But one can only assume its not a good thing when it comes to the printer itself.... given that all components on a Solidoodle are considered 'closed source' even when they are rebadged open-source elements.
I'm confused that 'open source is good' when it comes to filament (but not as good as Solidoodles own Filament unsurprisingly...)... but apparently not so good when it comes to the printer itself....