<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Slic3r help]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/9325/slic3r-help/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/9325/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Slic3r help.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Slic3r help]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/80043/#p80043</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I made 2 prints today use the models from Make magazine used to test the printers. I ran one through the XYZ software and one through slic3r using similar settings. The XYZ print came out looking better. The one on the right was from slic3r. I have them both set at .2mm, 10% infill. I&#039;m not sure what the speed differences are but XYZ was set at normal speed and slic3r was set at 40 mm/s. XYZ used the default of 220 temp for the extruder and I had slic3r set at 210.</p><p>Any help on understanding why such a difference in prints would be greatly appreciated. The print from slic3r also came out with ABS strands coming off 2 corners.</p><p>Thanks!<br />Ryan</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (rcskpeters)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/80043/#p80043</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
