<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Actual extrusion width]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/797/actual-extrusion-width/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/797/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Actual extrusion width.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 05:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Actual extrusion width]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7246/#p7246</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>nathankau wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>That&#039;s a good solution for parts that are only thin-walled. I think for parts that have thin-walls and thick parts, then the thick parts would get messed up.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>True, you might try to find a happy medium that works for both...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (DePartedPrinter)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 05:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7246/#p7246</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Actual extrusion width]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7231/#p7231</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s a good solution for parts that are only thin-walled. I think for parts that have thin-walls and thick parts, then the thick parts would get messed up.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nathankau)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 03:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7231/#p7231</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Actual extrusion width]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7197/#p7197</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>nathankau wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I printed a part that was 4 walls thick exactly (.42*4). However when I printed it there was a slight gap in the middle so the two&nbsp; walls on either side did not bond. </p><p>My questions is was this gap caused because the extruder multiplier isn&#039;t correct or does the slicer actually &quot;mush&quot; the layers a little bit together so the actual width of each thread would be something like 41mm?</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>You can use the extrusion multiplier to correct this problem if you don&#039;t care about the thickness being exact. I was printing some two walled parts and they were not bonding so I bumped the extrusion multiplier until enough plastic was flowing to get the sides to bond. Just a thought...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (DePartedPrinter)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7197/#p7197</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Actual extrusion width]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7175/#p7175</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well now I&#039;m not so sure if there was a gap or not. </p><p>I loaded a test stl with 1.68 width into repetier and slic3r-ed it. There&#039;s a teeny gap (~ .05mm) in the middle. I put the same STL into kisslicer and there is no gap.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nathankau)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7175/#p7175</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Actual extrusion width]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7174/#p7174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I used slic3r and in repetier there is not a gap. </p><p>Thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nathankau)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7174/#p7174</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Actual extrusion width]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7172/#p7172</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What did you slice with?&nbsp; I&#039;ve seen Skeinforge do that.&nbsp; Slic3r is better about filling narrow walls, and KISSlicer has done the best for me when I&#039;ve wanted to print something only 2 threads wide.</p><p>Look at the gcode preview in Repetier and see if it shows a gap there.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (IanJohnson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7172/#p7172</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Actual extrusion width]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7170/#p7170</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I printed a part that was 4 walls thick exactly (.42*4). However when I printed it there was a slight gap in the middle so the two&nbsp; walls on either side did not bond. </p><p>My questions is was this gap caused because the extruder multiplier isn&#039;t correct or does the slicer actually &quot;mush&quot; the layers a little bit together so the actual width of each thread would be something like 41mm?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (nathankau)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/7170/#p7170</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
