<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — 1.75mm verses 3mm filament]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/5135/175mm-verses-3mm-filament/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/5135/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in 1.75mm verses 3mm filament.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:25:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 1.75mm verses 3mm filament]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/46360/#p46360</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Its age of the designs and wether it uses a geared extruder or not is basically the difference.</p><p>3mm is where it all started, as this was what was readily available ~10 years ago - small tolerance 1.75mm just wasn&#039;t around in abundance... </p><p>3mm requires a lot more torque to move than 1.75mm - As the early reprap-esque printers all use big geared wades or similar extruders, the torque to move 3mm wasn&#039;t an issue either. Or they just used big heavy motors, which is why they all stayed relatively single-extruder based; as 2 x 3mm capable extruders in direct-drive is going to weigh a *lot*... </p><p>3mm requires much slower print speeds or much higher power heaters - the volume of 3mm filament in a melt chamber is considerably greater than that of a 1.75mm chamber - so more energy is needed to melt the filament in a timely fashion; or you have to lower your extrusion rate to allow more of the plastic to become consistently viscous. </p><p>3mm also had greater &#039;tolerance&#039; room - if you allow 2% tolerance, then it was ok to produce 2.95mm filament or 3.05mm... meaning you didn&#039;t need to have the highest quality manufactured filament. </p><p>1.75mm offers the counter point to most of what I outlined above:</p><p>You need less torque, so can either use smaller motors for direct-drive filament extrusion (such as the standard SD&#039;s extruder which is a around about a .7a stepper...) <br />You can have smaller/lighter motors, meaning you can run multiple extruders on an axis. <br />You need less torque, so a given motor can also extrude faster.<br />You have a smaller melt zone, so filament can be extruded faster and there is less &#039;wastage&#039; during color changes/transitions. <br />... and manufacturing tolerances have caught up to a point where 2% on 1.75mm is quite doable, making it plausible to reliably source 1.75mm that was relatively constantly 1.75mm (and not blowing out to 1.8mm and causing jams in a 1.78mm barrel...).</p><p>In todays terms, 1.75mm is the new &#039;standard&#039;, and 3mm is a throw back and legacy diameter - it doesn&#039;t offer anything but drawbacks in comparison to 1.75mm (and yes, you can compensate for many of those drawbacks, such as using bigger motors, higher power cartridges, higher geared ratios on a geared stepper... etc... but why bother if you can just go 1.75mm and avoid the issue <img src="https://www.soliforum.com/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /> )...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (adrian)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/46360/#p46360</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[1.75mm verses 3mm filament]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/46359/#p46359</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>looking at the different 3d printers some use 1.75mm filament some use 3mm filament.<br />what are the pros and cons of each filiment diameter? which is better and why?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dubbsd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/46359/#p46359</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
