<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Question about slicer and dual core processors with windows xp]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/3604/question-about-slicer-and-dual-core-processors-with-windows-xp/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/3604/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Question about slicer and dual core processors with windows xp.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about slicer and dual core processors with windows xp]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33607/#p33607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thread seems to mostly effect RAM usage for me. </p><p>In the past, on this x200 lenovo, repetier/slic3r was very bad at utilizing my computer resources. Slices that people reported take minutes would take me at least 30 minutes.&nbsp; Some slices took me 5+ hours.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know if this was the programs or windows. About five months ago it started utilizing my resources correctly, either an update with repetier or windows, and I&#039;m back in the regular ballpark of slicing (but a bit slower since this is a laptop.)</p><p>Good luck? My response was not particularly helpful just giving you my experience</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Tomek)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33607/#p33607</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about slicer and dual core processors with windows xp]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33570/#p33570</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I tried the threads and that seemed to have stepped it up a bit. It still acts strange though, when I slice it seems to hit 50% cpu utilization and it doesn&#039;t go any higher. It&#039;s slicer much faster now though so maybe I should another thread or two and see if that helps. Thanks for sending me down the right path.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (petra2201)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33570/#p33570</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about slicer and dual core processors with windows xp]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33561/#p33561</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a setting to create more threads in slicer,</p><p>Slic3r-&gt;configure-&gt;print Settings tab-&gt;advance , and &quot;threads&quot;</p><p>not sure if it will benefit from duo core...&nbsp; you should give it a try</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (RavensCrest)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33561/#p33561</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about slicer and dual core processors with windows xp]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33552/#p33552</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>One thing you can check is the process affinity (to make sure both cores are available to the app).</p><p><a href="http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/how-to-set-processor-affinity-to-an-application-in-windows/">http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-ti … n-windows/</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (3d-oodler)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33552/#p33552</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Question about slicer and dual core processors with windows xp]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33548/#p33548</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a windows xp Pro machine with an athlon 64 x2 3800+. I&#039;ve tried using the latest version of repetier and the official solidoodle one. When I slice with either software it maxes out one processor while leaving the other processor idle. I have a ubuntu machine that uses a slightly faster processor (a 4400+) and it uses both cores by default. Is there any way to make windows xp do this as well? Using both cores results in a MUCH faster slice.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (petra2201)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/33548/#p33548</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
