<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/2367/design-tips-for-additive-manufacturing/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/2367/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Design tips for additive manufacturing..]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/23120/#p23120</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Pretty thin. .010 to .015 inches. Any thicker and cleanup becomes just that much more difficult. Full capturing of hardware inside the print is a great idea Staffordknot. I have not get paused and resumed a print in RH yet, will try.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Briggs)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/23120/#p23120</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/23091/#p23091</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Briggs, how thin are your supports drawn please?</p><p>I had thought of installing a pause command in the gcode so i could pop in a hex nut / bearing&nbsp; or perhaps tubular insert to form shaft wall and then continue printing.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Staffordknot)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/23091/#p23091</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/23075/#p23075</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Attached are two pdf files of the same part, an alternative extruder for my SD3. One file shows supports that I had drawn into the part. The other pdf is how the part will look after all supports are cleaned off.</p><p>After my first print, using only Slic3r generated supports, I noticed that my overhangs left a lot to be desired, and were out of tolerance by quite a bit, stringy, etc. In terms of part design, it might be better to draw your own supports on problem overhangs. I had drawn my own supports into the part at only the most critical areas. I also asked Slic3r to generate its own support. The final part turned out really good. You can see it at this thread.<a href="http://www.soliforum.com/topic/2393/new-stud-mount-extruder-design/">http://www.soliforum.com/topic/2393/new … er-design/</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Briggs)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 04:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/23075/#p23075</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22963/#p22963</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Briggs. I expect to have a few more.&nbsp; I make a lot of mistakes.&nbsp; Hopefully someone can benefit from it :-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mark.burhop)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22963/#p22963</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22931/#p22931</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Mark, way to get this thread rolling with an awesome visual. Great advice. Thank you. </p><p>Another thing I could add is to try experimenting with your own drawn supports for overhangs. Sure they will require a bit more work to cleanup, but they will also create a more accurate and clean overhang. I&#039;ll post an example later using the new stud mount extruder concept I have been working on.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Briggs)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 22:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22931/#p22931</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22919/#p22919</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good idea.</p><p>Here is mine: <strong>Prefer chamfers over rounds in general.&nbsp; </strong></p><p>The &quot;rounded&quot; version on the right ends up a &quot;hairy&quot; mess at the bottom of the hole and pocket. This is because as you get to closing off each, your angles approaches 90 degrees.</p><p>The &quot;faceted&quot; version on the left is a nice and clean on the bottom.</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://virtualvector.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ScreenHunter_183-May.-15-14.481.jpg" alt="http://virtualvector.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ScreenHunter_183-May.-15-14.481.jpg" /></span> <br />(flat part you see is face down on the printer bed)</p><p>If you must use a round (such as to avoid stress concentration) try to make it vertical, not only so that it prints, but so the layers line up perpendicular to the &quot;line&quot; of high stress. That is, you want to be breaking the plastic strands, not separating two &quot;glued&quot; strands.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mark.burhop)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22919/#p22919</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22537/#p22537</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Call to all part designers, how about sharing your best tips for additive manufactured parts? In contrast to injection molded parts, I am personally finding it quite liberating to free myself from draft angles, thin wall sections, undercut nightmares, knit line strength issues, etc. </p><p>Here are some of my tips:</p><p>- Think about reducing overhangs from the very beginning of your design, and determine the face that&#039;s going to be printed first. </p><p>- Try to convert counterbore overhangs to 45degree chamfers instead, much easier to print a 45 degree overhang than a 90. </p><p>- Explore part trapping of features buried behind geometry. This is something that would be nearly impossible to mold, but easy to print, ie hex nut holes burried behind walls. </p><p>- 50% infill produces a surprisingly strong part. </p><p>Nothing earth shattering here, I know, but I&#039;m also pretty new to designing parts meant only to be printed. I&#039;m sure there are a lot of us that can learn from the rest of you! Thank you for your time.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Briggs)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 03:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22537/#p22537</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
