<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/17984/odd-printing-artifact/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/17984/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Odd printing artifact?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150202/#p150202</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I saw the formula.&nbsp; I had no idea the settings were decimal capable, all of my experience with embedded controllers etc. was integer only.&nbsp; All of the settings I have seen so far have been integers, furthering my mistaken belief, so I would have rounded the formula result anyway.&nbsp; I could tell it was close to E417 so I just tried E416.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Dave455)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150202/#p150202</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150199/#p150199</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>yes, you can, and should be using decimal places</p><p>and Carl, the formula is in that document i shared, as is the formula for calibrating the extrusion rate. <img src="https://www.soliforum.com/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (heartless)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150199/#p150199</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150197/#p150197</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Dave455 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>oh, I was thinking it was integer only.&nbsp; D&#039;oh!</p></blockquote></div><p>There is an actual formula for doing this so you don&#039;t have to guess. </p><p>New Steps/mm = (Old/Current steps/mm) x [100 / (measured distance filament traveled)]</p><p>You can also use,</p><p>(expected length* x current steps per mm) / actual length = new steps per mm</p><p>This is the one I use. </p><p>I actually made a spread sheet where I just plug in the required values and it spits out the new setting.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150197/#p150197</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150196/#p150196</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>oh, I was thinking it was integer only.&nbsp; D&#039;oh!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Dave455)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150196/#p150196</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150194/#p150194</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Dave455 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>That PDF is good.&nbsp; Thank you.</p><p>I set up as shown in the picture, and measured how far the filament moved after extruding 100mm.</p><p>99.23mm<br />so if anything it&#039;s a little short.</p><p>In Machine settings in the IIIP Cura, the E steps is set to 415</p><p>In the start code, I have E steps at 417, from the previous time I checked this.</p><br /><p>M501 returned this - <br />&gt; M501<br />&lt; echo:Stored settings retrieved<br />&lt; echo:Steps per unit:<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M92 X80.04 Y80.04 Z400.48 E94.30<br />&lt; echo:Maximum feedrates (mm/s):<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M203 X300.00 Y300.00 Z5.00 E25.00<br />&lt; echo:Maximum Acceleration (mm/s2):<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M201 X3000 Y3000 Z100 E500<br />&lt; echo:Acceleration: S=acceleration, T=retract acceleration<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M204 S800.00 T800.00<br />&lt; echo:Advanced variables: S=Min feedrate (mm/s), T=Min travel feedrate (mm/s), B=minimum segment time (ms), X=maximum XY jerk (mm/s),&nbsp; Z=maximum Z jerk (mm/s),&nbsp; E=maximum E jerk (mm/s)<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M205 S0.00 T0.00 B20000 X10.00 Z0.40 E1.00<br />&lt; echo:Home offset (mm):<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M206 X0.00 Y0.00 Z-1.90<br />&lt; echo:PID settings:<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; &nbsp;M301 P9.12 I0.41 D50.98</p><br /><p>So I send M92 E417 in the command window.<br />Re run the test...</p><p>I get 100.45mm</p><p>I set M92 E416</p><p>And measure 99mm.</p><p>Go back to 417, measure 100.37mm</p></blockquote></div><p>In case you are not aware, you can and should use decimal values like 417.6285. I have had to go out to 4 decimals sometimes to get an axis and the extruder truly dialed in.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150194/#p150194</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150191/#p150191</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That PDF is good.&nbsp; Thank you.</p><p>I set up as shown in the picture, and measured how far the filament moved after extruding 100mm.</p><p>99.23mm<br />so if anything it&#039;s a little short.</p><p>In Machine settings in the IIIP Cura, the E steps is set to 415</p><p>In the start code, I have E steps at 417, from the previous time I checked this.</p><br /><p>M501 returned this - <br />&gt; M501<br />&lt; echo:Stored settings retrieved<br />&lt; echo:Steps per unit:<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M92 X80.04 Y80.04 Z400.48 E94.30<br />&lt; echo:Maximum feedrates (mm/s):<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M203 X300.00 Y300.00 Z5.00 E25.00<br />&lt; echo:Maximum Acceleration (mm/s2):<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M201 X3000 Y3000 Z100 E500<br />&lt; echo:Acceleration: S=acceleration, T=retract acceleration<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M204 S800.00 T800.00<br />&lt; echo:Advanced variables: S=Min feedrate (mm/s), T=Min travel feedrate (mm/s), B=minimum segment time (ms), X=maximum XY jerk (mm/s),&nbsp; Z=maximum Z jerk (mm/s),&nbsp; E=maximum E jerk (mm/s)<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M205 S0.00 T0.00 B20000 X10.00 Z0.40 E1.00<br />&lt; echo:Home offset (mm):<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; M206 X0.00 Y0.00 Z-1.90<br />&lt; echo:PID settings:<br />&lt; echo:&nbsp; &nbsp;M301 P9.12 I0.41 D50.98</p><br /><p>So I send M92 E417 in the command window.<br />Re run the test...</p><p>I get 100.45mm</p><p>I set M92 E416</p><p>And measure 99mm.</p><p>Go back to 417, measure 100.37mm</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Dave455)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150191/#p150191</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150188/#p150188</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Dave455 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Now the outer edges are kind of blobby.&nbsp; Looks like over extruding a bit, <strong>I think</strong>.</p></blockquote></div><p>don&#039;t &quot;think&quot; it is, verify it!</p><p>there are very specific steps to take to properly calibrate things.</p><p>please see the attached...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (heartless)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150188/#p150188</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150187/#p150187</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Now the outer edges are kind of blobby.&nbsp; Looks like over extruding a bit, I think.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Dave455)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150187/#p150187</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150161/#p150161</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>personally, I would round it off to 1.67, but either way, that is the number to use in the slicing software.</p><p>and keep in mind that every spool WILL be different, and should be calibrated properly at the beginning of use.<br />Even 2 spools of the same brand, same color WILL vary in average diameter.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (heartless)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 00:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150161/#p150161</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150156/#p150156</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Dave455 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Made around 20 measurements over 10 feet of filament.</p><p>15 at 1.7mm<br />2&nbsp; at 1.727mm<br />3 at 1.676mm</p><p>Average = 1.669mm</p></blockquote></div><p>Then that would be the number you would use for filament diameter in your slicer and this will need to be confirmed and changed when needed on every spool you load.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150156/#p150156</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150155/#p150155</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Made around 20 measurements over 10 feet of filament.</p><p>15 at 1.7mm<br />2&nbsp; at 1.727mm<br />3 at 1.676mm</p><p>Average = 1.669mm</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Dave455)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150155/#p150155</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150140/#p150140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Dave455 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Ok, I wasn&#039;t clear, the nozzle is the 0.4mm one that came with he printer. <strong> The setting in IIIP Cura is [and always has been] set to 0.4mm</strong>.</p></blockquote></div><p>That is the information i was looking for.</p><br /><p>and carl - never say never.. it does not happen very often, but it does happen that the average does work out to 1.75 - I have a couple spools (out of roughly 50) that are set to 1.75 average diameter. <img src="https://www.soliforum.com/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (heartless)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150140/#p150140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150139/#p150139</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Dave455 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Ok, I wasn&#039;t clear, the nozzle is the 0.4mm one that came with he printer.&nbsp; The setting in IIIP Cura is [and always has been] set to 0.4mm.</p></blockquote></div><p>Cool and what is your filament diameter set for in Cura? Like I said it should not be 1.75. It should be an average of about ten measurement taken over several meters of the filament and it is never 1.75. Even 1.74 or 1.76 makes a big difference in the end results.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150139/#p150139</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150138/#p150138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I wasn&#039;t clear, the nozzle is the 0.4mm one that came with he printer.&nbsp; The setting in IIIP Cura is [and always has been] set to 0.4mm.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Dave455)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150138/#p150138</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Odd printing artifact?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150136/#p150136</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>carl_m1968 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I use Cura and nozzle size is set by the user in the main machine setting. The filament diameter also needs to be set as well and is not 1.75 ever. Yes that tiny little bit makes a major difference in the prints and how the slicer sets flow volume.</p></blockquote></div><p>yes, and he needs to verify that it is set correctly.</p><p>just saying the stock nozzle is a 0.4 means nothing.. it NEEDS to be set correctly within the program.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (heartless)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/150136/#p150136</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
