<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/16414/wanhao-duplicator-7-discussion/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/16414/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 20:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/154767/#p154767</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>hgoodarzy wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Dear all,</p><p>I want to open a Wanhao Duplicator 7 Plus, and replace its UV light source (~405nm) with another light source with wavelength around 500 nm.&nbsp; Do you guys have any idea if it is possible or not?<br />If its not possible, then what do you think if I want to remove the whole LCD and add my own Texas Instrument DLP with its own software and light source and lenses? Do you have had any experience of working with this printer after removing its LCD? Is it possible to use it like an open source device? Thanks a lot for sharing your ideas, if any.</p></blockquote></div><p>They work great as is, why would you want to change to a light source you have to buy non-standard resin for?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 20:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/154767/#p154767</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/154765/#p154765</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear all,</p><p>I want to open a Wanhao Duplicator 7 Plus, and replace its UV light source (~405nm) with another light source with wavelength around 500 nm.&nbsp; Do you guys have any idea if it is possible or not?<br />If its not possible, then what do you think if I want to remove the whole LCD and add my own Texas Instrument DLP with its own software and light source and lenses? Do you have had any experience of working with this printer after removing its LCD? Is it possible to use it like an open source device? Thanks a lot for sharing your ideas, if any.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (hgoodarzy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 09:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/154765/#p154765</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/152778/#p152778</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dubbsd wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Carl I have a question.<br />is the duplicator 7 a good enough printer to do lithophanes using white resin. <br />I know i would have to stand the lithophane on edge because of the bed size.<br />Looking to print&nbsp; lithophanes 100 X 100</p><p>thanks<br />Dale</p></blockquote></div><p>I see no reason why it couldn&#039;t. Its just a matter of finding the correct thickness or width versus opacity of the cured resin. The other issue might be the finished lithograph will discolor and become more brittle over time due to the fact that resin continues to cure over time with exposure to UV light and nearly all light has some level of UV in it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 23:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/152778/#p152778</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/152776/#p152776</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Carl I have a question.<br />is the duplicator 7 a good enough printer to do lithophanes using white resin. <br />I know i would have to stand the lithophane on edge because of the bed size.<br />Looking to print&nbsp; lithophanes 100 X 100</p><p>thanks<br />Dale</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dubbsd)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 19:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/152776/#p152776</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/152774/#p152774</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am in need of some trouble shooting advice. Got myself a D7plus a while back and found out the LCD screen cable was damaged when I tried printing large parts and noticed that a part of the screen was bad. Got two new LCD replacement kits and with both I don&#039;t get any image at all when I test with the test image to see the rhino. So checked if all connections on the ribbon cable pins is conducting. Swaped out a mix match of the boards and screens I have. Actually starting to think the LCD control board might be at fault but want to confirm whether or not an actaul image signal is being sent to the board. So hooked up the HDMI output to a projector to see if I can get an image but it only screams invalid format which leads me to a question. What image format is sent through the HDMI to the LCD control board for the Duplicator?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (reub.wentzel)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/152774/#p152774</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143578/#p143578</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>justsomeguy wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>My 1.5 came with a bare aluminum finish on the plate.</p></blockquote></div><p>mine D7 Plus is is the same.<br />Its flat for sure, but seems like it needs holes so it wont suck on the film when pulling it up.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (tonycstech)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2018 03:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143578/#p143578</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143562/#p143562</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>justsomeguy wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>My 1.5 came with a bare aluminum finish on the plate.</p></blockquote></div><p>Then it may need to be slightly roughed and still could be cupped or bowed.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 20:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143562/#p143562</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143561/#p143561</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>My 1.5 came with a bare aluminum finish on the plate.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (justsomeguy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 19:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143561/#p143561</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143560/#p143560</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The trick is simple really. Just loosen all four screws holding the plate the Z axis. Then home the platform through nanoDLP by sending it to the floor. This will home the axis relative to the sensor. Then simply press the platform, not the axis against the LCD by hand. Mind you not too much pressure as you just want it snug but not actually pushing on the LCD. While holding it down, tighten the screws back into the axis. Now when you home the Z axis the plate will be at the correct spot every time. </p><p>In regard to your issue though you could have one of the old platforms depending on where you bought it at and if that store updated their stock when the new platform rolled out which is doubtful. If you do have an old platform then it has two problems. One it is not flat in the middle but is cupped. Then the second issue is the finish. Mine was cupped by simply using sand paper to remove the black finish to bare aluminum and then a fine grit to smooth but still keeping it slightly rough worked great on mine. </p><p>I am not sure why they chose to paint the build surface as all the big name resin printers use a bare aluminum build plate.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143560/#p143560</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143558/#p143558</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m no expert but I think the bed should be touching the lcd with the fep in between. It sounds like you did it right or close enough. Try playing with your resin profiles a bit. I thought my d7 was broken until I basically doubled the cure time for my print. That got me something solid and attached to the bed. Then I started working my way back down. There is definietly a learning curve even if you have lots of FDM experience.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (justsomeguy)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143558/#p143558</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143555/#p143555</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand this machine.<br />It seems to me that you simply CANNOT 0 the bed.<br />Bed drops on the fep film and i can see FEP moves slightly.<br />If (per instructions) i apply light pressure to the rack while tightening the screws, it ends up about 0.6 too low.</p><p>I keep getting blob on the FEP instead of the bed.<br />I would print 3-5 layers and stop to see if its working and i get same thing again and again.</p><p>Replaced FEP (seemed to improve flatness but still about 0.1-0.2 too low )<br />So how in the world do i 0 the bed if FEP flexes on contact ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (tonycstech)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 08:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143555/#p143555</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143392/#p143392</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Chipmunk ?</p><p>... Alvin ???&nbsp; Is that you ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pirvan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 03:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143392/#p143392</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143391/#p143391</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well rain on my parade and call me chipmunk...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143391/#p143391</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143390/#p143390</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>carl_m1968 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>SLA is a general name for any printer that uses LIGHT regardless of the source to harden a photopolymer. The technology does not matter as the process is the same. Did you not read the definition of SLA that I posted? SLA stands for <strong>S</strong>tero<strong>l</strong>ithography <strong>A</strong>pparatus. Nothing more, nothing less. You are simply confused by the fact that the first SLA machines where only laser based. However SLA applies to ANY machine that uses LIGHT to cure a photopolymer.</p><p>Laser based machine as you said draw out a layer similar to an FDM machine. A DLP or DUV machine simply exposes one full layer at a time versus drawing it out. They both however use light for the hardening of the photopolymer and therefore both are SLA machines. </p><p>SLA does not have any thing to do with laser in the way it is used for these types of machines.</p></blockquote></div><p>Sorry Carl, but you&#039;re only partially right.&nbsp; </p><p>While a lot of Chinese 3d printer manufacturers keep referring to their progeny as SLA printers, the reality is the term was originally intended for laser based devices.&nbsp; </p><p>SLA was originally coined by Chuck Hull, who went on to to found 3D Systems.&nbsp; His patent specifically described &quot;a concentrated <strong>beam</strong> of ultraviolet light focused onto the surface of a vat filled with a liquid photopolymer&quot;. Aided by CAD/CAM software, the laser would draw the outlines of the object to be printed onto the surface of the resin, thereby polymerizing the area.</p><p>At the time of it&#039;s inception (early 80&#039;s) the technology predated the development of the DLP chips by almost 10 years.&nbsp; By the time Texas Instruments manufactured the first viable DLP chips in 1997, 3D Systems was already working on their 2nd generation SLA systems using solid state laser diodes.</p><p>Anyway, you&#039;re correct that, today, SLA is is used to primarily describe 3D printers that use some form of resin polymerization, but to correctly describe the differences between technologies, additional nomenclature must be applied.&nbsp; Below is a link that describes in detail the 3 different processes, as well as their correct naming:</p><p><a href="http://theorthocosmos.com/laser-sla-vs-dlp-vs-masked-sla-3d-printing-technology-compared/">http://theorthocosmos.com/laser-sla-vs- … -compared/</a></p><p>Hope this sheds some light on the technology and its nomenclature.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pirvan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 22:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143390/#p143390</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Wanhao Duplicator 7 Discussion]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143389/#p143389</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>tonycstech wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>carl_m1968 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>tonycstech wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Wanhao D7 is NOT an SLA printer.<br />No lasers there. Its LCD projection.<br />Just to clear things out for those who posted it under this category</p></blockquote></div><p>Not to be a hardass but maybe you need to educate yourself before coming in here and making a comment that makes you look like you know nothing..</p><p>Stereolithography (SLA or SL; also known as <span class="bbu">s</span>tereo<span class="bbu">l</span>ithography <span class="bbu">a</span>pparatus, optical fabrication, photo-solidification, or resin printing) is a form of 3D printing technology used for creating models, prototypes, patterns, and production of parts in a layer by layer fashion using photopolymerization, a process by which light causes chains of molecules to link, forming polymers.</p><p>If a 3d Printer uses LIGHT to activate the polymerization of the resin it is an SLA printer.</p></blockquote></div><p>Define the difference between DLP and SLA ?<br />DLP using projection via projector or LCD<br />SLA using laser that draws the image similar to FDM printer<br />Two are not the same.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>SLA is a general name for any printer that uses LIGHT regardless of the source to harden a photopolymer. The technology does not matter as the process is the same. Did you not read the definition of SLA that I posted? SLA stands for <strong>S</strong>tero<strong>l</strong>ithography <strong>A</strong>pparatus. Nothing more, nothing less. You are simply confused by the fact that the first SLA machines where only laser based. However SLA applies to ANY machine that uses LIGHT to cure a photopolymer.</p><p>Laser based machine as you said draw out a layer similar to an FDM machine. A DLP or DUV machine simply exposes one full layer at a time versus drawing it out. They both however use light for the hardening of the photopolymer and therefore both are SLA machines. </p><p>SLA does not have any thing to do with laser in the way it is used for these types of machines.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 21:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/143389/#p143389</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
