<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Linear motion X/Y alternative?]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/15028/linear-motion-xy-alternative/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/15028/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Linear motion X/Y alternative?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 02:01:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Linear motion X/Y alternative?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/124417/#p124417</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If used for a carriage it would mean two motors on the carriage unless used strictly for bowden setups. But then you are still left with a motor on carriage which was the reason for going to bowden in the first place. Not sure it would work for Y movement unless you moved the bed. If you move the gantry it would be hard to keep both sides even unless you used dual synchronized motors.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 02:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/124417/#p124417</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Linear motion X/Y alternative?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/124416/#p124416</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know if anyone has seen this yet, but it looks like a decent option. Anyone tried it yet?</p><p><div class="fancy_video_tag_player"><iframe class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vPPhwoe2QMU" frameborder="0"></iframe></div></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (metaldrgn)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 01:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/124416/#p124416</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
