<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/13416/da-vinci-10-not-pro-open-source-filament/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/13416/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 20:36:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/147773/#p147773</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As far as I understand, you can not use original xyz software (xyzware) after flashing repetier-firmware.</p><p>One of the major benefit of flashing repetier-firmware is that you don&#039;t have to use xyzware. XYZware is buggy slow and generate low quality prints. Allow use of 3rd party filament is just a bonus.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (yizhou.he)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 20:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/147773/#p147773</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/147767/#p147767</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to use original xyz software (xyzware) after flashing?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (krn78)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 09:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/147767/#p147767</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114510/#p114510</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>RC1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>social wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;ve almost given up. I made a chip resetter so was able to reset the chip length and also tell the cartridge it was PLA. Now when I try and print PLA the XYZ software says I can&#039;t because my head isn&#039;t PLA compatible.</p><p>I could solve this last issue by putting Repetier on it but if the XYZ software doesn&#039;t think I should print PLA with the current extruder head then I&#039;m not certain it would be worth doing. I&#039;m currently seriously thinking about getting&nbsp; new printer, either a Taz 5 or Makergear M2.</p></blockquote></div><p>If you are using the stock hot end that comes with the 1.0 don&#039;t bother trying to use PLA. It will not work, it jams due to the poor heat dissipation.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;ve gotten PLA to work by using the cooking oil hack. Not something I plan on doing long term though. But yes, it&#039;s definitely non-optimal to use PLA in the stock hot end.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dext0rb)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114510/#p114510</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114396/#p114396</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>social wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;ve almost given up. I made a chip resetter so was able to reset the chip length and also tell the cartridge it was PLA. Now when I try and print PLA the XYZ software says I can&#039;t because my head isn&#039;t PLA compatible.</p><p>I could solve this last issue by putting Repetier on it but if the XYZ software doesn&#039;t think I should print PLA with the current extruder head then I&#039;m not certain it would be worth doing. I&#039;m currently seriously thinking about getting&nbsp; new printer, either a Taz 5 or Makergear M2.</p></blockquote></div><p>If you are using the stock hot end that comes with the 1.0 don&#039;t bother trying to use PLA. It will not work, it jams due to the poor heat dissipation.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (RC1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114396/#p114396</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114360/#p114360</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>maybe try changing the extruder and bed temperature only and leaving it as abs?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (robertf)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114360/#p114360</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114349/#p114349</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve almost given up. I made a chip resetter so was able to reset the chip length and also tell the cartridge it was PLA. Now when I try and print PLA the XYZ software says I can&#039;t because my head isn&#039;t PLA compatible.</p><p>I could solve this last issue by putting Repetier on it but if the XYZ software doesn&#039;t think I should print PLA with the current extruder head then I&#039;m not certain it would be worth doing. I&#039;m currently seriously thinking about getting&nbsp; new printer, either a Taz 5 or Makergear M2.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (social)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114349/#p114349</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114318/#p114318</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>On my 2.0 I use a cartridge resetter and crack open and rewind the spools with inland filament</p><p>This also worked on my 1.0 when it was stock</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (robertf)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114318/#p114318</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114309/#p114309</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As above, here is a video to how you can do such. I flashed mine using this method. <div class="fancy_video_tag_player"><iframe class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rjuCvlnpB7M" frameborder="0"></iframe></div></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (RC1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114309/#p114309</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114264/#p114264</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>yes by flashing it to repetier</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mark.burton)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114264/#p114264</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Da Vinci 1.0 (not pro) open source filament?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114245/#p114245</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#039;m a noob with a Da Vinci 1.0, I have only just found out about the pro version and was wondering how to make the machine I&#039;ve got open filament. is it possible to convert the machine I have to an open source filament version?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (social)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 12:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/114245/#p114245</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
