<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — One vs Two lasers]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/12384/one-vs-two-lasers/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/12384/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in One vs Two lasers.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 07:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: One vs Two lasers]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/107173/#p107173</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Got way better results using the alternate allignment method described elsewhere in the forum (can&#039;t recall the post that quickly).<br />Now struggeling with lightning and getting consistent results</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mvoosten)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 07:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/107173/#p107173</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: One vs Two lasers]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/107159/#p107159</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When you scan an irregularly shaped object, you&#039;ll find that there are areas that one laser can&#039;t see, that the other laser does.</p><p>So scanning with both lasers is the desirable way.&nbsp; However, it does require proper calibration.&nbsp; </p><p>The auto-calibration feature in FreeLSS, does a really good job of aligning the 2 scans, but it does require&nbsp; prior physical alignment to be reasonably close, you can&#039;t expect the calibration to work if your physical alignment is really off.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pirvan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 02:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/107159/#p107159</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: One vs Two lasers]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/107149/#p107149</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Once calibrated, you can scan more of the model with two lasers than with one.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (hairu526)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 21:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/107149/#p107149</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: One vs Two lasers]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/107148/#p107148</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>So why have two lasers then with Atlas 3D. I only found it impossible to allign properly without getting weird overlaps in the scans</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mvoosten)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 20:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/107148/#p107148</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: One vs Two lasers]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/106168/#p106168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>ATLAS 3D can use one or two lasers for a scan.&nbsp; Two lasers does not increase the quality/precision but does reduce the number of &quot;gaps&quot; in the model due to concave areas on the part.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (hairu526)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 23:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/106168/#p106168</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[One vs Two lasers]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/106165/#p106165</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Are both lasers used by the software to create one model?<br />Is the quality better than a single laser setup?</p><p>Thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (holoped)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 22:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/106165/#p106165</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
