<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Another way to align lasers ?]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/11916/another-way-to-align-lasers/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/11916/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Another way to align lasers ?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 21:53:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Another way to align lasers ?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102737/#p102737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve moved my scanner, now it&#039;s aligned with window, both sides are equally lightened.</p><p>I&#039;ve followed Pirvan and is CD box. Not exactly the same print, just a cross with an horizontal ligne at 3.25&quot;<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/CD%20calibration%20OK.png" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/CD%20calibration%20OK.png" /></span><br />Not too far ...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pascalp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 21:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102737/#p102737</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Another way to align lasers ?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102705/#p102705</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m quite satisfied of the reflect alignment method, really sensitive. I found that my plate had a little bit of wobble. I&#039;ve used the old table coupler. The upgrade version is better, but I&#039;ll print-it with a tighter hole. The axe hole appear to be 5.25mm on the STL, with my printer a 5.05 will give a better fit and even a bit of reaming isn&#039;t a problem.</p><br /><p>I&#039;ve began to cure my lasers problem.<br />The culprit<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/laser_IMG_4245_cut_640.jpg" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/laser_IMG_4245_cut_640.jpg" /></span></p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/laser_IMG_4246_cut_640.jpg" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/laser_IMG_4246_cut_640.jpg" /></span></p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/laser_IMG_4247_cut_640.jpg" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/laser_IMG_4247_cut_640.jpg" /></span></p><p>The lens is only held by pressure between laser body and cap while a dab of glu join laser and cap.<br />Too few glu, glu soften by hot weather, gluing fragilized while turning laser held by the holder during alignment process, and the lens became free to rotate under tic-tic of the stepper.</p><p>I&#039;ve re-glued the cap with a bit of loctite on the side of the cap, nothing between lens and cap.</p><br /><p>I began to get results with simple model.</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/oeuf1.PNG" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/oeuf1.PNG" /></span><br />1.9M, right laser.<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/oeuf_ply.PNG" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/oeuf_ply.PNG" /></span></p><p>Just a little more &quot;sophisticated&quot; shape and threshold, lighting will need more attention.<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/other.PNG" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/other.PNG" /></span></p><p>Real difficulty arose with a not so complicated glossy model.<br />With repaired laser, dual scan was possible. L &amp; R 1.9M scan, light wasn&#039;t equal on both side. <br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/cat.PNG" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/20150731/cat.PNG" /></span><br />Will probably need, fine tuned multiple scans and worked and merged with meshlab&nbsp; to get a fine result.</p><p>Globally I&#039;m really satisfied of the Atlas3D. Hardware work, operator will have to master software.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pascalp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 10:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102705/#p102705</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Another way to align lasers ?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102636/#p102636</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>most lasers work best with dull black surfaces. when I used laser thermometers in my HVAC career I had to put black tape on grills to get best readings. makes sense as light is absorbed in dark colors and reflected on lite colors.</p><p> some scanners use grids for alignment I have seen. but not sure on this one.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (n2ri)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2015 06:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102636/#p102636</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Another way to align lasers ?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102534/#p102534</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I need to re-read instructions, I&#039;ve missed the dulling advice.<br />When scanning, I use the cover that came with the kit and didn&#039;t notice any obvious reflections. I&#039;ll pay attention next time.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pascalp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102534/#p102534</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Another way to align lasers ?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102502/#p102502</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>cool. also instructions say to dull plate with med-fine sand paper to prevent reflective double vision so to speak once aligned. so tight areas get scanned correctly.</p><p>another thing I always wondered is, if one laser was on a bit higher horizontal plane (about a half inch or so) than the other would that help with say scanning over hangs on object being scanned. where both lasers on exact same plane would not see top/bottom of such shapes? or would this need to be another pair of lasers/cameras set on vertical plane from top/bottom focused in center of scan area?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (n2ri)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 02:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102502/#p102502</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Another way to align lasers ?]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102436/#p102436</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I was trying to find a place for my scan beside my printer.</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/3Dshelf_20150729_152608_cut_800.jpg" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/3Dshelf_20150729_152608_cut_800.jpg" /></span></p><p>During a calibration, while playing with lasers I found that my plate was a kind of mirror and reflect light.</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3d_reflect-calibration_20150729_155623_cut_1024.jpg" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3d_reflect-calibration_20150729_155623_cut_1024.jpg" /></span></p><p>At first glance It make me smile, then It make me thinking ...<br />The laser out of alignment with the plate make the reflected light at angle (twice the error) with the direct lightning. So direct and reflect intricated could indicate a perfect alignment ?!</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3d_reflect-calibration_ok_20150729_155639_cut_1024.jpg" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3d_reflect-calibration_ok_20150729_155639_cut_1024.jpg" /></span></p><p>A close-up with lasers aligned and centered on the center point of the plate.<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3d_reflect-calibration_ok_closeup_20150729_155639_cut_800.jpg" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3d_reflect-calibration_ok_closeup_20150729_155639_cut_800.jpg" /></span></p><p>When the plate is perdendicular with the wall/backplate the 2 lines are //. But this is not mandatory, if I dont miss, It works equally well as I only consider direct and reflected light.</p><br /><p>I just made a try with my plate not aligned with wall to check and I found that one of my laser have rotate <img src="https://www.soliforum.com/img/smilies/sad.png" width="15" height="15" alt="sad" /> , not to much but my method seems to be accurate.<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3D_laser-rotate_20150730_155050_cut_640.jpg" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3D_laser-rotate_20150730_155050_cut_640.jpg" /></span></p><p>Lasers are firmly held, BUT the internal screen move/rotate <img src="https://www.soliforum.com/img/smilies/sad.png" width="15" height="15" alt="sad" /> <br />Some really light (really light) taps on the arm give<br /><span class="postimg"><img src="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3D_laser-rotate2_20150730_155130_cut_640.jpg" alt="http://pascalp2.free.fr/images/1usinage/Atlas3D/atlas3D_laser-rotate2_20150730_155130_cut_640.jpg" /></span></p><p>I hope that a drop of cyano could cure the problem wiich affect both of my lasers.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pascalp)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/102436/#p102436</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
