<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — mostly calibrated]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/11255/mostly-calibrated/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/11255/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in mostly calibrated.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 06:43:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: mostly calibrated]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96931/#p96931</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yup, don&#039;t touch those steps-per-mm unless you&#039;re trying to fix an error below about 0.01mm... :Z<br />&lt;=0.3mm could quite likely a combination of wall thickness variation and hysteresis in that axis. This is all neglecting print imperfections (there&#039;s at least 0.1mm worth of bulge in your corners... Slic3r is working on an extruder pressure control algorithm to try and minimise these, but until then no dice haha), and thermal effects (warping, bending, stretching filament etc.). You&#039;ll also have to accept at some point that life in the land of FFF doesn&#039;t get a whole lot better than this! <img src="https://www.soliforum.com/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>In order to determine whether your problem is a constant error or a proportional error, you will need to calibrate at least two points (e.g. do a 80mm square too). See this diagram: <a href="http://www.soliforum.com/post/88520/#p88520">http://www.soliforum.com/post/88520/#p88520</a></p><p>The only number I&#039;m seeing there you&#039;re likely to improve with tuning is the 19.76. I think you should be able to bring that up a bit once you&#039;ve worked out what the cause is (of many options...)!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (grob)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 06:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96931/#p96931</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: mostly calibrated]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96791/#p96791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you adjust steps per mm this way, you will see error accumulation in larger prints. The stock steps per mm are correct. You have play in an axis, probably Y at the drive rod.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jagowilson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 04:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96791/#p96791</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: mostly calibrated]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96789/#p96789</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Just google adjusting steps per mm. Plenty of videos and tutorials on it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 04:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96789/#p96789</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: mostly calibrated]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96788/#p96788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>not sure how to do that</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Manx)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 04:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96788/#p96788</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: mostly calibrated]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96786/#p96786</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Just need to tweak your steps per mm on each axis a bit unless you are happy with that tolarance.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (carl_m1968)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 03:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96786/#p96786</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[mostly calibrated]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96783/#p96783</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok so i printed a cube out it was modeled at 20 mm cubed with an interior holes that was 18mm around and 19mm deep</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Manx)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 03:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96783/#p96783</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
