<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Laser color.]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/11188/laser-color/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/11188/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Laser color..]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 15:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Laser color.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96298/#p96298</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That is very interesting. I am currently testing with your new version. I have been chasing some red hearings with it. For one I seemed to have bumped one of my lasers, even so the scan was suprisingly good. The second thing I cannot fully explain is the software once installed took the .freelss.properties from my original setup just fine. Then I had a crash of the software and figured why not reboot the PI. At that point the .freelss.properties was reset to the default values and my old profile disapeared. I should have backed that up in retrospect.</p><p>I have two theories on this at the moment.</p><p>- My SD card is going bad. (I write the freelss logs to a directory on auto start) I may move these to my NAS in the future. <br />- My pi is loosing stability for reasons unknown.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (engineerd3d)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 15:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96298/#p96298</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Laser color.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96193/#p96193</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>FreeLSS primarily uses pixel intensity changes to detect the laser line, so any color laser should work though some better than others.&nbsp; I&#039;ve tested with blue and red lasers and they both worked fine.&nbsp; That being said, I introduced a secondary test for red pixels in version 1.5 to better differentiate the laser from the background.&nbsp; However, I plan on making this an optional setting since it takes more Pi processing power and is not necessary for those that have the scanner facing a back drop.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (hairu526)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 22:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96193/#p96193</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Laser color.]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96185/#p96185</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Uriah;</p><p>I have been contemplating this for a while and at one point someone contacted me about my own scanner asking the same question. Typical camera CCD&#039;s have twice as many green pixels than any other color. Is it possible to use freelss with green lasers? Or will the software get confused? I see green modules have dramatically dropped in price in the past few years since I was looking for them. This can put them within the reach of most people. While roughly 2x the price of red modules they may be worth a shot. Some of them are claiming ultra fine laser lines as well. </p><p>The theory is simply to have a laser that is not so badly affected by ambient light as well as a laser that is less susceptible to reflections on shiny surfaces. </p><p>Does this theory hold any water?</p><p>-Bruno M.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (engineerd3d)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/96185/#p96185</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
