<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Dual Extrusion with 3.0mm and 1.75mm]]></title>
		<link>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/10445/dual-extrusion-with-30mm-and-175mm/</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/rss/topic/10445/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Dual Extrusion with 3.0mm and 1.75mm.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dual Extrusion with 3.0mm and 1.75mm]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/89962/#p89962</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is true, E steps-per-mm is shared between axes in Marlin. Marlin development version is fixing this at the moment though, so if you&#039;re ready to experiment with a pretty wild version of Marlin, you may get what you&#039;re looking for. Check out the github page and have a look. <img src="https://www.soliforum.com/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (grob)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/89962/#p89962</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dual Extrusion with 3.0mm and 1.75mm]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/89914/#p89914</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Marlin doesn&#039;t let you set steps per mm per extruder axis? I guess that *is* true... Good looking out because I was about to suggest something that will not work <img src="https://www.soliforum.com/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p><p>Perhaps with a geared setup running in Bowden you could get the steps per mm for each axis very close, if not identical. Just a thought. If you can drive both extruders with the same hobbed bolt, or at least one with the same OD, I *think* your steps per mm would be the same for each extruder, but I may be thinking incorrectly.</p><p>If you can&#039;t overcome this hurdle and not get the steps per mm equal, I would suggest not even wasting your time. The results would be... less than ideal.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jagowilson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/89914/#p89914</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dual Extrusion with 3.0mm and 1.75mm]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/89908/#p89908</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am certainly not the expert with this but I can say that with dual extrusion both steppers need to run at the same calibrated steps/mm.&nbsp; Since I have little experience with 3mm filament I don&#039;t know how close the two would be.&nbsp; It may be possible to split the difference and make up for that difference in the extrusion multiplier within your slicer.&nbsp; Either way it seems like a good way to make a complicated process even more difficult.&nbsp; I would consider just getting another 1.75 hot end.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (wardjr)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/89908/#p89908</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dual Extrusion with 3.0mm and 1.75mm]]></title>
			<link>https://www.soliforum.com/post/89897/#p89897</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I find myself in possession of 1x 3.0mm J-head and 1x 1.75mm J-head, both with a 0.5mm end on them. Is there reason I cannot use them in a dual extrusion set-up. Are there any problems I might face? Theoretically to me , as long as the filament is coming out the same diameter, and I am able to set the firmware for each separately--it should work.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Morganism)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.soliforum.com/post/89897/#p89897</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
