<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Slic3r help]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/atom/topic/9325/" />
	<updated>2015-01-19T00:20:29Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/9325/slic3r-help/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Slic3r help]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/80043/#p80043" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I made 2 prints today use the models from Make magazine used to test the printers. I ran one through the XYZ software and one through slic3r using similar settings. The XYZ print came out looking better. The one on the right was from slic3r. I have them both set at .2mm, 10% infill. I&#039;m not sure what the speed differences are but XYZ was set at normal speed and slic3r was set at 40 mm/s. XYZ used the default of 220 temp for the extruder and I had slic3r set at 210.</p><p>Any help on understanding why such a difference in prints would be greatly appreciated. The print from slic3r also came out with ABS strands coming off 2 corners.</p><p>Thanks!<br />Ryan</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rcskpeters]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/8667/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-01-19T00:20:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/80043/#p80043</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
