<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Material Flow Rate Calibration in Cura Using a Powder Scale]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/atom/topic/9232/" />
	<updated>2015-02-16T03:26:08Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/9232/material-flow-rate-calibration-in-cura-using-a-powder-scale/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Material Flow Rate Calibration in Cura Using a Powder Scale]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/85470/#p85470" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>jagowilson wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It&#039;s grams, but I like this idea. As soon as I find my pocket scale, I will give this a try in slic3r.&nbsp; </p><p>Have you measured the wall thickness after calibrating in this way? I have numerous concerns, but I want you to tell me more about your success before I express them.</p></blockquote></div><p>Sorry for the slow response. The numbers I used are in grains, not grams, so you&#039;d have to convert to grams if you prefer that unit of measure. One thing I forgot to mention is you have to set the flow to 100% to print the test cube, otherwise it screws up the calculations. I haven&#039;t done before and after measurements of wall thicknesses, but just from eyeballing it, if the flow rate is too high, the plastic squishes out, so I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;d end up thicker if some of that was going on. As near as I can tell, manufacturing tolerances on filament are loose enough that absolute perfection is unobtainable, but so far I&#039;ve found this approach gets me in the ballpark of where I need to be without doing a lot of hunting and trial and error.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Don9mm]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/6875/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-02-16T03:26:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/85470/#p85470</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Material Flow Rate Calibration in Cura Using a Powder Scale]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/79636/#p79636" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s grams, but I like this idea. As soon as I find my pocket scale, I will give this a try in slic3r.&nbsp; </p><p>Have you measured the wall thickness after calibrating in this way? I have numerous concerns, but I want you to tell me more about your success before I express them.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jagowilson]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/7321/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-01-17T02:57:44Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/79636/#p79636</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Material Flow Rate Calibration in Cura Using a Powder Scale]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/79455/#p79455" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve seen a number of different methods for calibrating the flow rate for filament, such as using calipers to measure filament, etc. I don&#039;t know if this is the best section to post this, but it seemed close enough, since it has to do with extrusion. Anyhow, I worked out a method that seems to work well that I thought I would share.</p><p>1. At the bottom of the &quot;basic&quot; menu settings in Cura, there&#039;s a box for filament diameter and flow rate. For diameter, enter whatever diameter filament you&#039;re using, 1.75 or 3.</p><p>2. Build a STL for a box with a volume of 1 cubic centimeter. For example, 1 cm x 1 cm x 1 cm, or 1 cm x 2 cm x .5 cm, etc. That will be your calibration file.</p><p>3. You can get digital scales for measuring small amounts of weight starting around $25. They&#039;re commonly sold for measuring powder for reloading ammunition, scientific stuff, etc. I calculated the weight of 1 cubic centimeter of ABS at 16.1 grains. That number can be converted to whatever unit of measure you prefer, ounces, miligrams, etc.</p><p>4. Print the 1 cm calibration file and weigh it.</p><p>5. Divide 16.1 grains by the result, which will give you the percent value to enter in the &quot;Flow&quot; box in Cura. For example, if the weight of the calibration model is 16.5 grains, divide 16.1 by 16.5 to get .9757, or 97.6%.</p><p>Manufacturing tolerances on fliament diameter can vary a bit. I&#039;ve been using this method when I load a new spool of filament and it seems to give good results. It only takes a few minutes to print a 1 cm box and the method is reasonably idiot proof, without a whole lot of fooling around. When I print a second box and weigh it after doing the above, the margin of error in the 16.1 target weight is tiny, usually within 1/10th of a grain.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Don9mm]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/6875/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-01-16T10:50:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/79455/#p79455</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
