<![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Steps per millimeter]]> 2014-06-02T20:53:16Z PunBB https://www.soliforum.com/topic/6614/steps-per-millimeter/ <![CDATA[Re: Steps per millimeter]]> Yes It is widely accepted that GT2 is better, though not for that reason.

Google, my friend!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic … wEDweDq-uE

]]> https://www.soliforum.com/user/221/ 2014-06-02T20:53:16Z https://www.soliforum.com/post/57767/#p57767 <![CDATA[Re: Steps per millimeter]]> So using a GT2 system is better right? A GT2 with 20 Pulley tooth count gives you 80 steps per milimeter (no fraction)

]]> https://www.soliforum.com/user/914/ 2014-06-02T20:51:33Z https://www.soliforum.com/post/57766/#p57766 <![CDATA[Re: Steps per millimeter]]> No such thing as .58 of a step. smile

]]> https://www.soliforum.com/user/221/ 2014-06-02T04:35:25Z https://www.soliforum.com/post/57707/#p57707 <![CDATA[Steps per millimeter]]> While researching on some issues I am having with my printer I found that a RepRap calculator. I cehecked the steps per millimeter. Solidoodle EEPROM has 88.00 steps per millimeter but if you plug the numbers in the calculator you get other numbers:


Result    Resolution    Teeth    Step angle    Stepping    Belt
87.58    11.41875micron    18    1.8°    1/16th            2.03mm


Is there any advantage in using this number instead?

CB

]]> https://www.soliforum.com/user/914/ 2014-06-02T04:27:47Z https://www.soliforum.com/post/57705/#p57705