<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — reasonably priced bed temp measurement?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/atom/topic/4825/" />
	<updated>2013-12-12T17:51:59Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/4825/reasonably-priced-bed-temp-measurement/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: reasonably priced bed temp measurement?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/44124/#p44124" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>So, if my meter doesn&#039;t have a temp setting, I&#039;d have to do the math from the NIST tables to translate voltage to temp? (Or get a new meter that does have the temp setting).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Claghorn]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/270/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-12T17:51:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/44124/#p44124</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: reasonably priced bed temp measurement?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/44092/#p44092" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I use this one at work and it works good<br /><a href="http://www.extech.com/instruments/product.asp?catid=66&amp;prodid=626">http://www.extech.com/instruments/produ … prodid=626</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dubbsd]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/187/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-12T10:28:57Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/44092/#p44092</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: reasonably priced bed temp measurement?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/44083/#p44083" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Many reasonably priced non-fluke DMM&#039;s come with type-k thermocouples.... usually around the $30-$50 mark.</p><p>The piece of tape + ir might will work ok - but IR itself has a host of issues that means its not the panacea many make it out to be... so piece of tape + really very very close + ensuring the sensor angle covers *only* the tape (as any surface with emissivity issues in view of the sensor will cause issues - such as aluminium) will be ok...</p><p>But me, I&#039;d just have a DMM with a thermocouple attachment.. for a few dollars more you can get datalogging or wireless ones to transmit the data back to a PC for capture even.... *shrug*</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[adrian]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/663/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-12T08:04:39Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/44083/#p44083</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[reasonably priced bed temp measurement?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/43963/#p43963" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Is there a reasonably priced thermistor or thermocouple unit out there which could be used to measure the temp of the print bed with a direct surface probe? I can easily find Fluke units for several hundred dollars, but I was hoping for something much cheaper than that :-).</p><p>Would sticking a piece of tape on the bed and using an IR unit be just as accurate as a surface probe?</p><p>I&#039;d like to find out what temps I&#039;m actually getting with my stock heater and do some calibration when/if I replace it with the QU-BD.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Claghorn]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/270/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-12-11T13:20:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/43963/#p43963</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
