<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/atom/topic/2367/" />
	<updated>2013-05-17T16:32:08Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/2367/design-tips-for-additive-manufacturing/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/23120/#p23120" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Pretty thin. .010 to .015 inches. Any thicker and cleanup becomes just that much more difficult. Full capturing of hardware inside the print is a great idea Staffordknot. I have not get paused and resumed a print in RH yet, will try.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Briggs]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1282/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-17T16:32:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/23120/#p23120</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/23091/#p23091" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Briggs, how thin are your supports drawn please?</p><p>I had thought of installing a pause command in the gcode so i could pop in a hex nut / bearing&nbsp; or perhaps tubular insert to form shaft wall and then continue printing.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Staffordknot]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1769/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-17T08:07:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/23091/#p23091</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/23075/#p23075" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Attached are two pdf files of the same part, an alternative extruder for my SD3. One file shows supports that I had drawn into the part. The other pdf is how the part will look after all supports are cleaned off.</p><p>After my first print, using only Slic3r generated supports, I noticed that my overhangs left a lot to be desired, and were out of tolerance by quite a bit, stringy, etc. In terms of part design, it might be better to draw your own supports on problem overhangs. I had drawn my own supports into the part at only the most critical areas. I also asked Slic3r to generate its own support. The final part turned out really good. You can see it at this thread.<a href="http://www.soliforum.com/topic/2393/new-stud-mount-extruder-design/">http://www.soliforum.com/topic/2393/new … er-design/</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Briggs]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1282/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-17T04:24:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/23075/#p23075</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/22963/#p22963" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Briggs. I expect to have a few more.&nbsp; I make a lot of mistakes.&nbsp; Hopefully someone can benefit from it :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mark.burhop]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1802/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-16T01:21:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22963/#p22963</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/22931/#p22931" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Mark, way to get this thread rolling with an awesome visual. Great advice. Thank you. </p><p>Another thing I could add is to try experimenting with your own drawn supports for overhangs. Sure they will require a bit more work to cleanup, but they will also create a more accurate and clean overhang. I&#039;ll post an example later using the new stud mount extruder concept I have been working on.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Briggs]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1282/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-15T22:38:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22931/#p22931</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/22919/#p22919" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Good idea.</p><p>Here is mine: <strong>Prefer chamfers over rounds in general.&nbsp; </strong></p><p>The &quot;rounded&quot; version on the right ends up a &quot;hairy&quot; mess at the bottom of the hole and pocket. This is because as you get to closing off each, your angles approaches 90 degrees.</p><p>The &quot;faceted&quot; version on the left is a nice and clean on the bottom.</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://virtualvector.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ScreenHunter_183-May.-15-14.481.jpg" alt="http://virtualvector.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ScreenHunter_183-May.-15-14.481.jpg" /></span> <br />(flat part you see is face down on the printer bed)</p><p>If you must use a round (such as to avoid stress concentration) try to make it vertical, not only so that it prints, but so the layers line up perpendicular to the &quot;line&quot; of high stress. That is, you want to be breaking the plastic strands, not separating two &quot;glued&quot; strands.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mark.burhop]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1802/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-15T21:51:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22919/#p22919</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Design tips for additive manufacturing.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/22537/#p22537" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Call to all part designers, how about sharing your best tips for additive manufactured parts? In contrast to injection molded parts, I am personally finding it quite liberating to free myself from draft angles, thin wall sections, undercut nightmares, knit line strength issues, etc. </p><p>Here are some of my tips:</p><p>- Think about reducing overhangs from the very beginning of your design, and determine the face that&#039;s going to be printed first. </p><p>- Try to convert counterbore overhangs to 45degree chamfers instead, much easier to print a 45 degree overhang than a 90. </p><p>- Explore part trapping of features buried behind geometry. This is something that would be nearly impossible to mold, but easy to print, ie hex nut holes burried behind walls. </p><p>- 50% infill produces a surprisingly strong part. </p><p>Nothing earth shattering here, I know, but I&#039;m also pretty new to designing parts meant only to be printed. I&#039;m sure there are a lot of us that can learn from the rest of you! Thank you for your time.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Briggs]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1282/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-12T03:57:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/22537/#p22537</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
