<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — What makes the filastruder slower than the Filabot?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/atom/topic/16072/" />
	<updated>2017-01-27T14:54:02Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/16072/what-makes-the-filastruder-slower-than-the-filabot/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: What makes the filastruder slower than the Filabot?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/131687/#p131687" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As has been said here, on the EX2 it&#039;s a custom machined screw and faster motor. On the Original it&#039;s just a faster motor. The Original&#039;s speed specifications seem off to me, they say 40 inches per minute which is 200 feet per hour. A half pound of PLA filament would be 245 feet, but they claim a half pound per hour. </p><p>I also haven&#039;t seen any third party reports of Filabot speed. Not saying it isn&#039;t true, but at the very least speed varies quite a bit with regard to filament size and material type. Some folks have done 1kg in 3 hours on a Filastruder but I wouldn&#039;t post that speed on the website specifications section.</p><p>The Filabot also consumes 500 watts, while the Filastruder consumes less than 80.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[elmoret]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/221/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-01-27T14:54:02Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/131687/#p131687</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: What makes the filastruder slower than the Filabot?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/131685/#p131685" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ah. I see that&#039;s interesting. I&#039;m assuming the feed screw is tapered to get smaller at the end along with the barrel to allow for higher nozzle pressure. Thanks for the reply!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Voyex]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/15490/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-01-27T13:38:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/131685/#p131685</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: What makes the filastruder slower than the Filabot?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/131677/#p131677" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>If i have my info straight the filabot EX 2 has a custom feed screw. This design is patentedd pending this is what for allows a near 1 lilo per hour feed rate. I am sure there are some other differences as well. IIRC more metal parts as well<br /> for case etc. Filabot more for the industrial market it is a preasembed and I expect some testing done. the filasruder is sold as a kit although at least one vendor sells it as a pre built.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Tin Falcon]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/6775/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-01-27T10:26:31Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/131677/#p131677</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[What makes the filastruder slower than the Filabot?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/131672/#p131672" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I understand there is a massive price difference and I am completely satisfied with the extrusion rate of the filastruder but, what makes the Filabot so much faster?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Voyex]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/15490/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2017-01-27T06:19:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/131672/#p131672</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
