<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Linear motion X/Y alternative?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/atom/topic/15028/" />
	<updated>2016-06-22T02:01:32Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/15028/linear-motion-xy-alternative/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Linear motion X/Y alternative?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/124417/#p124417" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>If used for a carriage it would mean two motors on the carriage unless used strictly for bowden setups. But then you are still left with a motor on carriage which was the reason for going to bowden in the first place. Not sure it would work for Y movement unless you moved the bed. If you move the gantry it would be hard to keep both sides even unless you used dual synchronized motors.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[carl_m1968]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/7731/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-06-22T02:01:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/124417/#p124417</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Linear motion X/Y alternative?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/124416/#p124416" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know if anyone has seen this yet, but it looks like a decent option. Anyone tried it yet?</p><p><div class="fancy_video_tag_player"><iframe class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vPPhwoe2QMU" frameborder="0"></iframe></div></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[metaldrgn]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/2429/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-06-22T01:49:24Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/124416/#p124416</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
