<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — light conditions and other questions]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/atom/topic/13271/" />
	<updated>2016-01-03T18:44:57Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/13271/light-conditions-and-other-questions/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: light conditions and other questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/113169/#p113169" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>as i eventually figured it out , it&#039;s usefull to have those two lasers for those faces of the object which normal deviates much from radial direction yet remaining in the plane of the table.</p><p>This is why for an almost isotropic object in the plane of the table: cylindrical symmetry&nbsp; (as the one i&#039;m scanning) it does not matter to use the two lasers.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[fhenryco]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/13134/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-01-03T18:44:57Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/113169/#p113169</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: light conditions and other questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/113167/#p113167" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it would have been useful to have a second camera rather than a laser on a different position: if the laser line is out of the camera&#039;s reach you won&#039;t be able to see the detail in the scan. Also, if you think about it, being the lasers on a parallax of the camera, they can point different details that might not be visible when the model rotates to the other side.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[ephestione]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/12527/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-01-03T18:14:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/113167/#p113167</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: light conditions and other questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/113166/#p113166" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have another more theoretical question: i dont understand why two lasers are needed, since given the symetry of the table both lasers should have seen exactly the same scene after 360°.&nbsp; It would have made more sense to have a second laser looking at the scene from above to really catch points from a different angle and allow the lasers correct the grazing angle effects from one another...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[fhenryco]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/13134/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-01-03T18:01:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/113166/#p113166</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: light conditions and other questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/113163/#p113163" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>When you have reflective object, or one on which the laser washes out, the best thing to do is coat the surface with something that will reduce the reflections.&nbsp; </p><p>Some folks had gone to the extents of painting the model with a flat primer, but that&#039;s pretty drastic.&nbsp; Instead, I &quot;borrowed&quot; some make up powder from my wife, and mixed with some talcum (baby) powder, and I use a makeup brush to apply the mix to the model.&nbsp; </p><p>It doesn&#039;t need a lot, just enough to lightly coat the surface.&nbsp; This works wonders, and when done, you simply blow the powder off your model.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pirvan]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1357/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-01-03T17:18:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/113163/#p113163</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: light conditions and other questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/113160/#p113160" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Re the multi scan question<br />Do a search on here for user (pirvan) he has done a couple of good write up the second one is about multiple scans<br />Bill</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Mwaypilot]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/8732/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-01-03T16:29:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/113160/#p113160</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[light conditions and other questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/113140/#p113140" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi everybody,</p><p>i&#039;v just assembled and done my first scans with atlas3d. My simple questions surely have been asked somewhere else here but at first glance at the topics i dont see them...</p><p>I need to scan an uniformly white plaster object which i actually obtained by moudling my own finger. it&#039;s not high because it&#039;s only one phalange, yet it&#039;s probably already too high so the scanner cuts the summit (a hole in the region badly accessible to the laser: grazing angle) . </p><p>My questions are:</p><p>- What are the best light conditions for such object (daylight?, obscure room? ) <br />- any other advice for the settings in HD?<br />- I&#039;m going to lower the object as much as possible, but if there is still this hole, what is the solution to get a complete scan? is it possible to scan the object twice in two different positions and then merge the two scans by software? any good tutorial around to get that ? i have meshlab installed</p><p>Thank you in advance for helpul advices and comments</p><p>Fred</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[fhenryco]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/13134/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-01-03T11:06:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/113140/#p113140</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
