<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[SoliForum - 3D Printing Community — Camera Resolution]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://www.soliforum.com/feed/atom/topic/11815/" />
	<updated>2015-07-24T12:05:03Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://www.soliforum.com/topic/11815/camera-resolution/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Camera Resolution]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/101922/#p101922" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes, very nice!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[hairu526]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/4789/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-24T12:05:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/101922/#p101922</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Camera Resolution]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/101816/#p101816" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Nice scan! You captured a lot of detail there.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[ggunners]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/4235/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-23T14:50:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/101816/#p101816</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Camera Resolution]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/101801/#p101801" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Here is a scan I did with v1.9.</p><p>The scan was done at 5MP, and 2400 steps / revolution.&nbsp; It took approximately 70 minutes to complete and generated a 45MB PLY file.</p><p>IN the photo below, you can see (from left to right), a snapshot of the camera view, the raw PLY point cloud, poisson disk sample and the reconstructed poisson mesh.</p><p>Not too bad, considering the complexity of the model. <img src="https://www.soliforum.com/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="http://www.soliforum.com/misc.php?action=pun_attachment&amp;item=8957" alt="http://www.soliforum.com/misc.php?action=pun_attachment&amp;amp;item=8957" /></span></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pirvan]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1357/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-23T06:37:54Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/101801/#p101801</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Camera Resolution]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/101731/#p101731" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Under certain conditions the software would throw out a laser line instead of relying upon the laser range selection logic to make sense of it.&nbsp; This was previously used in combination with the logic that would &quot;rescan&quot; when it detected a problem.&nbsp; However, that was removed a release or two ago due to the slow down it caused and the number of false positives.&nbsp; Since the logic was no longer there to rescan, the result was that the laser line was completely dropped.&nbsp; This issue was more likely to occur with 5MP since there are more opportunities to trigger the &quot;throw out condition&quot;, but all of the modes were susceptible to it.&nbsp; I have updated to logic so that the laser line is now retained under these conditions and the laser range selector seems to be doing a decent job of figuring things out.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[hairu526]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/4789/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-22T13:22:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/101731/#p101731</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Camera Resolution]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/101708/#p101708" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This seems to work quite well.&nbsp; I&#039;ll do a few more complex scans and post the results.</p><p>Once again, thanks for your great work.</p><p>BTW, what was causing the problem?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pirvan]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1357/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-22T02:24:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/101708/#p101708</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Camera Resolution]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/101602/#p101602" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>@pirvan, I just committed a fix for the issue where gaps could occur in the 5MP mode.&nbsp; Please let me know how it works for you.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[hairu526]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/4789/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-21T02:47:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/101602/#p101602</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Camera Resolution]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/101598/#p101598" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I think the ultimate solution is to resolve the issue with 5MP.&nbsp; I was side tracked with a couple new features for the next release but now I am focusing on this particular issue and plan on resolving it before the next software release.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[hairu526]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/4789/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-21T00:33:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/101598/#p101598</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Camera Resolution]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.soliforum.com/post/101503/#p101503" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way t select a different camera resolution, other than thre resolution already provided?</p><p>For example, I&#039;d like to try a 1900px or a 2048px width still.&nbsp; In other words a resolution somewhere between 1.9mp and 5mp.&nbsp; 2048 x 1536 would be a good 3mp middle of the road.</p><p>My problem is that 5mp resolution almost always gives me these scans with lots of missing bands ( mentioned this in another thread).&nbsp; But when I do 1.9mp scans, they don&#039;t have this problem.</p><p>I think the problem is related to memory and/or resources (or lack thereof), so maybe a resolution somewhere in between might not suffer from these problems.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pirvan]]></name>
				<uri>https://www.soliforum.com/user/1357/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-19T03:00:25Z</updated>
			<id>https://www.soliforum.com/post/101503/#p101503</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
